Stablecoin Regulations: MiCA vs. US GENIUS Act - A Side‑by‑Side Comparison
Compare the EU's MiCA stablecoin rules with the US GENIUS Act framework. Learn key differences, market impact, compliance steps, and future outlook for issuers.
When working with MiCA, the Markets in Crypto‑Assets Regulation that the European Union introduced to create a unified rulebook for tokens, exchanges, and service providers. Also known as EU Crypto Regulation, it aims to protect investors, keep markets fair, and give crypto businesses a predictable legal footing. In plain language, MiCA tells a new token whether it needs a prospectus, how an exchange can safeguard user funds, and what AML checks are mandatory. The MiCA framework therefore touches everything from a small DeFi project in Berlin to a big exchange that wants to serve users across all EU states.
One direct off‑shoot of MiCA is the rise of Virtual Assets Law, national legislation that adapts the EU framework to local markets, such as Jordan’s 2025 Virtual Assets Law or Vietnam’s Directive 05/CT‑TTg. These laws inherit MiCA’s core pillars—risk warnings, licensing, and AML requirements—while adding country‑specific rules. For example, the Jordanian guide "How Jordanians Trade Crypto Despite Banking Restrictions" shows how the new Virtual Assets Law gives traders a legal pathway that didn’t exist under the earlier banking bans. Similarly, the Vietnam piece explains how Directive 05 shapes exchange licensing and stablecoin bans, echoing MiCA’s emphasis on consumer protection. Another essential companion to MiCA is Crypto Exchange Licensing, the process that lets exchanges obtain an EU passport after meeting capital, governance, and security standards. Under MiCA, a licensed platform can offer custody services, launch tokens, and provide market-making without having to seek separate approvals in each member state. This licensing model is the reason why the "CanBit Crypto Exchange Review 2025" highlights the exchange’s compliance badge as a trust signal for EU users. Finally, MiCA sits inside a broader EU Crypto Regulation, the umbrella of rules that includes MiCA, the Digital Operational Resilience Act, and updated AML directives. The ripple effect is visible in non‑EU markets: Thailand’s 2025 ban on foreign P2P platforms, detailed in the "Thailand's 2025 Ban on Foreign P2P Crypto Platforms" article, reflects a global push for tighter oversight, a trend also seen in the SEC’s $4.68 billion crypto fine roundup. In short, MiCA influences how regulators worldwide think about licensing, token classification, and consumer safeguards.
What does all this mean for everyday crypto participants? If you’re a trader in Jordan, the local Virtual Assets Law now lets you move crypto legally, reducing reliance on risky P2P markets. If you run a token project, MiCA tells you whether your token is a "utility" or a "security" and what disclosure paperwork you need—knowledge that can save you from costly enforcement actions like those faced by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) scam. If you’re scouting an exchange, the licensing badge indicates that the platform meets MiCA’s capital and security thresholds, a factor highlighted in the "CanBit Crypto Exchange Review 2025" and the "UBIEX Crypto Exchange Review 2025". Below, you’ll find a curated list of articles that break these concepts down into actionable steps: from navigating Jordan’s banking restrictions, understanding Thailand’s crackdown, decoding Vietnam’s licensing rules, to learning how the SEC’s enforcement patterns may affect your project. Each guide is written to help you apply MiCA’s principles right now, whether you’re trading, building, or complying.